Improve syntax-index entry for lifetime bounds #30689
Conversation
Manishearth
force-pushed
the
lifetime-bound
branch
from
bc57f1e to
5a14f37
Compare
|
We should, and I thought I did. I'm not sure this is the place for explaining, though, it's for summarizing and linking to where it's explained elsewhere. |
|
Yeah, this isn't the best place for explaining, but there should be a one-line explanation anyway in case of ambiguous terminology (i.e. "outlives") |
|
r? @steveklabnik (apparently assignment didn't catch) |
|
@bors: r+ rollup i'm still pretty meh but if you think it's important, i'm okay with it. |
|
📌 Commit 5a14f37 has been approved by |
…klabnik We should have stuff on this in the book somewhere too r? @steveklabnik
|
⌛ Testing commit 5a14f37 with merge 804c1d1... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt |
|
@bors: retry |
|
⌛ Testing commit 5a14f37 with merge efde4f3... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt |
|
@bors: retry On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:10 PM, bors [email protected] wrote:
|
We should have stuff on this in the book somewhere too
r? @steveklabnik